Most halftime adjustments aren't real adjustments.
They're louder versions of what wasn't working in the first half. More urgency, same framework. More emotion, same assumptions. You're in the locker room telling your outside hitter to keep her elbow up, your point guard to stop forcing it, your midfielder to stay in his lane — and you walk back out on the floor having changed exactly nothing about the game plan that got you into this mess in the first place.
That's not an adjustment. That's a guess dressed up in a dry-erase marker.
Single Loop vs. Double Loop: The Thermostat Test
In the 1970s, organizational theorist Chris Argyris introduced a framework that should be required reading for every coach, at every level, in every sport. He called it double-loop learning and the easiest way to understand it is to think about a thermostat.
Single loop: The thermostat is set to 68 degrees. Gets cold, turns on the heat. Gets warm, shuts off. Detects the error, corrects the error, stays inside the same program. That's single-loop thinking, adjust within the framework.
Double loop: The thermostat stops and asks: Why 68 degrees? Who decided that? Is that even the right goal? It's not correcting the error. It's questioning whether the entire premise is correct.
One fixes what's wrong. The other asks whether we're even solving the right problem.
Here's a sport example. A tennis player keeps hitting into the net. Single loop: she adjusts the racket angle on the next swing. That's a correction. That's fine. But double loop asks a different question — is my aggressive baseline strategy even appropriate given how fatigued my legs are right now? Is the problem the swing, or the mental model she's running the entire game from?
She doesn't just change the angle. She changes the framework.
When Each One Actually Belongs
Single loop isn't the enemy. Let's be clear about that.
You need single-loop adjustments constantly. Ninety percent of our day, and most of what happens at practice, should run on single-loop thinking. That's how habits form, how fundamentals get built, how athletes stop overthinking and start executing. An athlete who questions every fundamental every time they fail isn't developing. They're spiraling.
The problem shows up when a pattern of failure keeps appearing in different costumes. Same issue, different game, different opponent. Same frustration, different uniform. That's your signal. You cannot single-loop your way out of a double-loop problem.
You're asking an efficiency question: are we doing things right?
When the moment demands an effectiveness question: are we doing the right things?
Princeton in the national championship. Down early, giving up three quick goals. They didn't tinker with technique. They scrapped man defense and went zone, a true second-half adjustment, and held Notre Dame scoreless for nearly twenty minutes. That's double-loop thinking in real time. That's a coaching staff willing to say the plan was wrong and act on it.
The Paradox: Why Your Best Athletes Resist This Most
Here's where it gets uncomfortable.
The most successful, highly trained, elite athletes are often the absolute worst at double-loop learning. And the reason is straightforward: they rarely fail. Because they rarely fail, they never build the mental muscle required to learn from it. They were bigger, stronger, faster than everyone around them for long enough that the methods that got them there became invisible — unquestioned assumptions baked into how they see themselves as competitors.
When their core strategy gets challenged, the gut reaction isn't curiosity. It's defensiveness.
Argyris called this Model I - an internal operating system built on four rules:
- Always be in control.
- Maximize winning and minimize losing at all costs.
- Suppress negative emotions.
- Be purely rational.
When you run on Model I, feedback doesn't feel like information. It feels like a threat. And it triggers what Argyris called a doom loop: a spiral of shame and defensiveness that completely shuts down the capacity for real learning.
You've seen it. The player who blames the referee. The coach who credits every loss to effort rather than examining the scheme. The athlete who gets two technical corrections and shuts down entirely. That's not stubbornness for its own sake. That's Model I doing exactly what it was designed to do: protect the ego.
I've been that coach. I've been that athlete.
The "More" Trap: A Personal Note
I used to believe I could outwork my problems. It worked for me as an athlete. No matter what I was facing, the answer was always more: more reps, more film, more time on the wall, more time in the weight room. After a loss at Marymount, I'd unlock the weight room and go in alone. That was my answer for everything.
And for a while, it worked. Until it didn't.
When I became a coach, more was still my solution. Athletes not bought in? They need more conditioning. Effort down in practice? More accountability, more extra work, more time. I was pushing people into corners without ever stopping to ask why the effort wasn't there in the first place, what I might be doing to create the resentment I was seeing, what the actual root cause was.
It carried into relationships, into my professional life. More effort, more time, more gifts, more connections, never enough, because I was solving the wrong problem.
My pay Luke Summers started to pull me out of it. Not by telling me I was wrong, but by asking the uncomfortable questions: why this? Do people actually want that, or just need it? He cared more about me than he cared about validating my ideas. That's the work. That's double-loop thinking in a friendship.
You cannot flip the switch at halftime if you haven't built it somewhere else first.
The Challenge of Looking Inward
Double-loop learning isn't conceptually hard. Most coaches get it quickly. The concept makes sense.
It's psychologically hard.
Because asking is my entire offensive system built on the wrong premise? brings up guilt. Embarrassment. The real possibility that something central to how you see yourself as a coach might be wrong. That's a different ask than "run faster."
There's also what I call the success trap. A championship you won five years ago creates gravitational pull toward the mental model that produced it. Even when the personnel has changed, the game has evolved, and the context is completely different. The trophy becomes evidence that you're right, when what it actually proves is that something worked in a different moment, with a different group, against different opponents.
We also commit attribution errors. Losses get explained by pointing outward: poor effort, bad breaks, officiating. Wins pull everything back toward us. The research is clear on this, and most of us, if we're honest, have done both.
The self-awareness has to come first. You cannot double-loop your way out of a mental model you refuse to acknowledge you're operating from.
5 Steps to Build It This Off-Season
Double-loop learning cannot be installed at halftime. It has to be built before the season starts: when the pressure is lower, the scoreboard isn't running, and you have the psychological safety to expose assumptions without the immediate cost of a loss.
Here's where to start.
Step 1: Immerse in Discomfort
You cannot challenge your mental models if you stay in the same room with the same people thinking the same thoughts. Get to a conference in a sport that isn't yours. Spend an afternoon watching a program that runs a system completely opposite to yours. You're not looking to convert. You're looking for friction. Friction is how you find the edges of your assumptions.
Step 2: Enlist Truth Tellers
Not critics. Not yes-men. People who care more about you than they care about your ideas and will surface the gap between what you say you value and what you're actually doing. One person who will tell you what that gap looks like from the outside is worth more than a room full of people telling you you're right.
Step 3: Orchestrate Productive Failure
The off-season is your laboratory. Design experiments. Install your offense with a group of kids who've never played in your system and see how fast they pick it up. Test the defense with athletes who don't know the vocabulary yet. If it holds up, now you know why it works. If it falls apart, even better, now you know what to actually fix.
Step 4: Uncover Hidden Assumptions
Try the left-hand column exercise. Draw a line down the middle of a piece of paper. On the right side, write the script of a difficult coaching conversation you recently had, or how a perfectly executed practice install would go. On the left side, write everything you were actually thinking and feeling that you didn't say. The gap between those two columns is your work.
Step 5: Build Cognitive Agility
Make it a daily practice to shift between the two questions. In pre-practice staff meetings. In your journal. In how you debrief after a scrimmage.
Are we doing things right?
That's efficiency, that's a single loop.
Are we doing the right things?
That's effectiveness, that's double loop.
The goal is to make questioning the framework as automatic as correcting within it.
The Bottom Line
Neither single-loop nor double-loop thinking is the enemy. You need both. Single loop becomes a problem when it becomes your only tool, when more, harder, faster is the answer to every question, when the finger always points outward, when your methods become so invisible to you that you can't see them anymore.
The coaches who make real halftime adjustments aren't just thinking faster than everyone else. They've spent the off-season building the capacity to question themselves under pressure. They've practiced it. They've made it a habit.
You can't flip that switch in ten minutes on a locker room whiteboard.
Build it now, before you need it.
Raise the Game
Enroll now in our new course on confidence and connection, Why They're Not Listening: Coaching the Modern Athlete. If you’re ready to modernize your coaching, deepen your impact, and develop athletes who become leaders—not just performers—this course is your playbook.
Share this blog with a coach who needs it.
Drop me an email if this message hit home.
Your athletes are waiting for a coach who understands their language…
A coach who can connect, communicate, and elevate.
Let’s raise the game—together.