You do not rise to the level of your expectations. You fall to the level of your training.
That line gets used a lot in rooms full of operators and athletes, and it's true in both. Under pressure, you don't discover some higher version of yourself. You default to whatever's been drilled into you. The reps you've actually put in, not the ones you meant to put in, are what shows up when it counts.
Leadership works the same way. Think back to the first time you got named captain or stepped into a leadership role.
Maybe it was a patch on your jersey. Maybe it was a text from your coach. Maybe your teammates voted and your name got called out in the locker room.
And in that moment, you didn't rise to some new standard. You fell to whatever training you already had, whether anyone called it training or not. Your dad. An older sibling who used to boss you around at the dinner table. A coach you had in another sport. The captain you watched two years ago when you were a freshman just trying to survive practice.
Here's the problem. That training happened by accident. Nobody sat you down and built it on purpose. And just because that's the training you've got, doesn't make it right.
The Gap Nobody Talks About
If you fall to the level of your training under pressure, it's worth knowing exactly what that training produces. Back in the 1970s, researchers Chris Argyris and Donald Schön started studying why people's actions don't always match what they think they're doing. They found a consistent gap between how leaders describe their own behavior and how that behavior actually lands on the people around them.
They called these espoused theory and theory in use. Espoused theory is what you'd say if someone asked you how you lead. Theory in use is what your teammates actually experience from you.
Most first-time captains have never closed that gap, because they've never had a reason to look at it. You inherit a leadership style from whoever was closest to you growing up, and you run it on autopilot. Argyris and Schön mapped out two patterns for how that autopilot plays out. They called them Model 1 and Model 2.
Model 1: The Self-Protective Captain
Model 1 runs on four core values: define and achieve your own goals, maximize winning and minimize losing, avoid negative feelings, and be rational. Reasonable enough on paper. Here's what it looks like on the field.
A Model 1 captain manages unilaterally. He makes the call, doesn't invite input, and expects people to fall in line. When a teammate pushes back, it doesn't register as useful feedback. It registers as a threat.
A Model 1 captain also avoids negative feelings, which sounds healthy until you see what it actually produces. It means avoiding hard conversations. Letting an underperforming senior slide because confronting him feels uncomfortable. Talking about a teammate instead of to him, because that's easier.
Underneath it all runs a quiet belief system: it's not my fault, the problem is the other person, and if they push back, that just proves they're the problem. So the pressure gets intensified, or the person gets shut out.
This is what happens when leadership gets inherited from a parent who ran the house on control, an older sibling who pulled rank instead of earning respect, or a coach who yelled first and explained never.
The cost shows up fast. Teammates start to see the captain as defensive, inconsistent, selfish. Mistrust grows. People stop bringing real problems forward, because they've learned real problems get punished. Argyris and Schön call the deeper cost single-loop learning: the surface problem gets patched, a missed rotation, a blown coverage, but the pattern underneath it never gets touched. The team gets better at hiding mistakes. It doesn't get better at solving them.
Model 2: The Open Captain
Model 2 runs on a different foundation: information is valid and reliable, choices are free and informed, everyone owns their own behavior, and openness wins over control.
Instead of managing unilaterally, a Model 2 captain builds joint control of the task. That doesn't mean stepping back from leading. It means bringing people into the decision instead of just announcing it, and leaving room for someone to say "wait, here's a problem with that."
Instead of avoiding hard conversations, a Model 2 captain combines advocacy with inquiry. Say what you think. Then ask what they think. In that order, every time. "Here's what I saw in that last set. Here's why it worries me. What did you see from your side?" That single move does more for a team than a month of silent frustration.
Model 2 captains test their assumptions out loud instead of privately deciding someone is lazy, or scared, or selfish, and never checking if it's true.
The payoff is real. Less defensiveness in the room. Relationships that can take pressure without cracking. Norms where learning is expected instead of punished. And double-loop learning: the team doesn't just fix the mistake in front of it, it starts fixing the pattern that caused it. That's the difference between a team that plateaus and a team that keeps improving in November.
This is harder than Model 1. It takes more courage to say "here's what I think, tell me if I'm wrong" than to just make the call and walk away. But it's the model that actually earns the trust a captain's patch is supposed to represent.
As John Wooden put it: "Whatever you do in life, surround yourself with smart people who'll argue with you." A Model 1 captain surrounds himself with people who agree, and calls it loyalty. A Model 2 captain builds a circle that pushes back, because that friction is where the real learning happens.
Three Questions for This Week
Pick one moment where you led as a captain this week. Practice, a game, a group text with your team. Then ask yourself:
- What did I actually say and do in that moment, not what I meant, what I actually did?
- If I asked my teammates to describe that moment, would their story match mine?
- Was I protecting myself in that moment, or was I protecting the relationship and the learning?
That gap between what you think you did and what your team experienced is the whole ballgame. Closing it is what separates a captain who just wears the title from a captain who actually leads.
You didn't choose your first leadership model. It came from your parents, your siblings, your old coaches. Nobody sat you down and taught you Model 2. But you get to choose it now. Every single day, you get to choose it again.
Raise the Game
Enroll now in our new course on confidence and connection, Why They're Not Listening: Coaching the Modern Athlete. If you’re ready to modernize your coaching, deepen your impact, and develop athletes who become leaders, not just performers, this course is your playbook.
Share this blog with a coach who needs it.
Drop me an email if this message hit home.
Your athletes are waiting for a coach who understands their language…
A coach who can connect, communicate, and elevate.
Let’s raise the game, together.